Compass put out research this week saying homes shown on Zillow sold for 1.3% less than homes Zillow had banned. Within two days, three different groups of economists went after it — on the size of the sample, on missing controls, on the fact that every listing came from Compass’ own business. They called it the ‘Zillow tax.’ Every one of those complaints is fair. Not one of them found the real problem. The problem isn’t how they built the sample. It’s what they measured. The caption on that post is flat wrong. Homes shown on Zillow did not sell for 1.3% less. A misstatement that big has another name, and plenty of people would use it. Here’s why. What they actually measured Per Compass’ own research release, the company looked at 296,966 of its listings from January 2025 through May 2026. Of those, 806 were banned by Zillow. The banned homes came in at 100% of their asking price. The homes on Zillow came in at 98.7%. Compass took that gap, multiplied it against the price of a typical American home, and called it a “$5,590 Zillow tax.” Now here’s the part that matters. It does not measure how much money the seller walked away with. It can’t. Because the asking price isn’t a fact ab...
Compass claims a $5,590 Zillow tax, but the maths not mathing
1 month ago
52
Related
South Yarra mansion linked to billionaire Smorgon dynasty se...
11 hours ago
10
Sydney’s great house and unit divide
16 hours ago
9
Tips
click
Popular
TWO wins final regulatory approval for CCM deal
4 weeks ago
59
Mark Zuckerberg buys an Irish castle
4 weeks ago
57
Spec House 101: What to Know Before Buying
4 weeks ago
49
The $5,000 question: How much will those repairs cost?
3 weeks ago
49
What can the government do to lower mortgage rates?
4 weeks ago
48
MBA mortgage applications dip 1% as refinance slips 2%
3 weeks ago
47
© Clint's Real Estate 2026. All rights are reserved


















English (US) ·